I Was At Woodstock 99: Here’s How Accurate Netflix’s Documentary Is

As the second Woodstock documentary to come out in less than a year, Netflix’s Trainwreck: Woodstock ’99 is the most accurate one yet, and I should know–I was there. I was 18 years old, and about to head home for summer break after my first year of college. I was excited to see my high school friends again, and even more excited that a few of us had decided to go to Woodstock ’99 later that summer. Little did I know it would be one of the craziest experiences of my life, the Fyre Festival before Fyre Festival even existed.

Tickets were pricey–$150 dollars, the equivalent of almost $270 today. It was a huge chunk of change for a broke college student to hand over, but it was Woodstock ’99. It was going to be historic. We knew we had to go. The hefty ticket price should have been a warning about what was to come at the actual festival, a foreshadowing. But we were young, we were energetic, and there was no way we were going to miss that lineup.

To say Woodstock ’99 was a transformative experience was an understatement. My friends and I were all good kids, a little naive for having grown up in a small, rural town–we didn’t even drink–but we were music junkies and we’d been to dozens of concerts and music festivals already. We thought we were prepared. We were not. Nor, it seemed, were the Woodstock ’99 festival organizers. Here’s what Netflix’s Trainwreck: Woodstock ’99 got absolutely right about the festival–and what details it missed.

Having It At An Air Force Base Was A Terrible Idea